Preparing for Surgery
After returning from Colorado, Karon and Emu’s team engaged in a months-long conversation about energy modeling, determining the window and door packages, and figuring out the sequencing that would allow him to live in the house while performing the retrofit. These services were available because Karon is participating in Emu’s North American Passive House Pilot Program.
According to Emu co-founder Enrico Bonilauri, Emu’s consulting process follows two steps for any project. The first, known as Project Boost, occurs at the schematic design stage of a project and was once known as Preliminary Passive House Review. “We factor in different variables to see how much to insulate or what window packages to use and try to find the sweet spot for the project,” says Bonilauri. Those who are hoping to improve the performance of the project for comfort, indoor air quality, and energy efficiency, and build better than code—but not follow through with certification—will follow the recommendations from Project Boost and stop there.
Bonilauri estimates that 20% of those who participate in Project Boost go on to become part of the more intensive Pilot Program and to certify, while the remaining 80% use the Passive House science to improve the building and inform decisions on performance and budget at an early stage. The 20% who take part in the Pilot Program provide data to Emu and in return receive assistance in navigating the certification process and access to resources that include construction details, specs, reviews of Passive House-related quotes, support during construction, and dedicated pricing from participating manufacturers. As Bonilauri notes, many single-family projects have details that are very similar, and it is not an efficient use of resources to have the architect treat common iterations as unique design challenges. By providing standardized, pre-vetted Passive House details for more familiar features, Emu’s Pilot Program reduces time and costs for modeling, and shifts the focus to supporting the builders during construction.
Ultimately, Emu and Karon determined that certifying under the Passive House Institute’s EnerPHit standard was the most feasible option for the project. PHI created the EnerPHit standard specifically for retrofits. While less rigorous than the traditional Passive House standard, it accounts for immutable factors that can adversely affect the performance of existing buildings such as form factor or orientation, Bonilauri says. Bonilauri also notes that they determined that of the two paths to EnerPHit certification, the component path and the performance path, the former was more practical.
“The component path is almost prescriptive,” Bonilauri says. “Passive House does not have mandated R-values or U-values for certification, whereas EnerPHit by components does.” Moreover, there are no caps on heating and cooling demand when following the component path, but Bonilauri notes that energy modeling using the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) is still necessary to comply with the primary energy renewable (PER) requirement.
Following the component path has also made certification easier for Karon, as his renovation is being spread out over several years in an incremental process, rather than all at once. Karon notes that there were even options to complete the retrofit over the course of 12 or 15 years had he wanted to only work a few weeks out of the year. However, he’s taken a more aggressive route and hopes to finish in less than half that time. For him, it’s not merely a place to live or a project, but a showpiece for others in the area who have never heard of Passive House construction or an EnerPHit retrofit, and throughout construction he has provided local people with tours of the house whenever he can.
“Whoever built it, I’m really impressed,” Karon says, reflecting on how the original house was almost ideal for EnerPHit certification. It needed minimal changes in terms of site work and orientation. Moreover, it’s remained comfortable throughout construction. Even in the dead of winter, he has managed to heat the home with just two space heaters and a wood stove.
Built in 1957, Karon’s house is a modest bungalow with 1,150 ft2 on the ground floor and the same footprint in the basement, which had been finished even before Karon started the retrofit and contains his two boys’ bedrooms, as well as a guestroom, laundry room, den, and full bathroom. The home sits on a hill oriented almost due south, and along the south-facing wall are three large windows that look directly out to Mount Livingston. It also has a hipped roof with 30-inch eaves that provide a lot of solar shading.
“I definitely got lucky with the house to start,” he says.