By Mary James
The 2021 heat wave that hit Western Canada killed nearly 700 people and triggered emergency health visits for so many more. Hospital admissions for heatstroke, which rose by more than 16,000%, cost the Canadian health system on average $10,300 per patient, according to a study by Dale Beugin et al. Of the 619 people that died in British Columbia, 98% of those deaths happened at home—a sad testament to the inability of those homes to provide a healthy and resilient environment for those occupants. Valuing Deep Retrofits, a Pembina Institute report, presents a convincing case that investing in retrofits reaps a wide spectrum of benefits.
While energy cost savings are an important part of a deep retrofit’s subsequent benefits, that’s certainly not a complete picture. Retrofitted buildings can help occupants minimize exposure not just to extreme heat, but also to cold, wildfire smoke, and air pollution generally—all of which adds up to better health outcomes both immediately and in the long term. Although many residents of Passive House buildings have completed occupant surveys testifying to their advantages, actual data on deep retrofits’ health outcomes have been harder to come by. This report does a notable job of compiling research from around the world—New Zealand, Australia, Wales, England, and even the United States—that examines the health-related impacts of retrofits.
As just one example, in New Zealand a cost-benefit analysis was conducted of its Warm Up New Zealand program that provided funding and grants for insulation and heat pumps or biomass burners. Researchers compared retrofitted to non-retrofitted homes, tracking such health outcomes as hospitalization rates, prescription drug costs, and mortality. The program delivered a net return of four dollars in benefits for every dollar spent.